to make the comparison meaningful the same midi file capture of my performance was used to render in each tuning using pianoteq 5. The original was performed in Margo’s variation. I thnk the subharmonic version has some interesting aural properties when the sustain pedal is engaged.
Audio Player
cicada 17 OT
Audio Player
cicada 17 UT
Audio Player
17 var. ji4
Audio Player
Tzitzikas 17
Audio Player
17 edo
Scott Dakota ! Cicada17_Ot_17ed2_RationalDetemper_HarmonicSeries24-48slice_JI(17).scl ! Harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. From 21, but centered as 24:25:26:27:28:29:30:32:33:34:36:37:39:40:42:44:46:48. Scott Dakota, Nov 2015. 17 ! 25/24 13/12 9/8 7/6 29/24 5/4 4/3 11/8 17/12 3/2 37/24 13/8 5/3 7/4 11/6 23/12 2/1 ! Cicada17_Ut_17ed2_RationalDetemper_SubHarmonicSeries24-48slice_JI(17).scl ! Sub-harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. From 1/21, but centered as 1/(24:25:26:27:28:29:30:32:33:34:36:37:39:40:42:44:46:48). Scott Dakota, Nov 2015. 17 ! 24/23 12/11 8/7 6/5 16/13 48/37 4/3 24/17 16/11 3/2 8/5 48/29 12/7 16/9 24/13 48/25 2/1 Margo Schulter ! 17var-ji4.scl ! Close variation on tuning at x31.eq.com 17 ! 117/112 13/12 44/39 233/199 121/98 169/132 4/3 112/81 81/56 176/117 224/143 13/8 12/7 16/9 224/121 48/25 2/1 Paul Erlich ! Tzitzikas17_Ot_17ed2_RationalDetemper_HarmonicSeries_48-96slice_JI(17).scl ! Harmonic series rational detempering of 17ed2. 48:49:52:54:56:58:60:64:66:68:72:74:76:80:84:88:92:96. By Paul Erlich 01Dec2015, re: Cicada by Scott Dakota 17 ! 49/48 13/12 9/8 7/6 29/24 5/4 4/3 11/8 17/12 3/2 37/24 19/12 5/3 7/4 11/6 23/12 2/1
Leave a Reply